That seems to be smoke to our eyes as we all just received a form to support or not the development. A monstrosity with views on expanding to neighbouring land. The amount of traffic, fumes and noise customers and deliveries will be unbearable. The “High” Street is suffering already though some have braved the climate and rented or refurbished a new shop. If they were happy to keep it as is, just like the Co-op did at Chislehurst, I might consider a more positive view but, not ever to demolish it and build a generic building thus destroying the little character left on the High Street. I wish the council would get its priorities together and purchase the building from that elusive agent. Then, the library ( which could see so much improvement ) and other services could run there along with a nice family centre, a restaurant which would generate income and halls to rent, even to the College, for functions, etc.
Good morning Athina
Much of the content of your comment was represented at the original battle over the site, and the destruction of the site was deferred by the ACV declaration. Interim discussions have fallen on totally deaf ears at Lidl, including offers to purchase. We are about to create a dedicated page on the website for new discussion, and would welcome your input. You are also encouraged to contribute your time and ideas to the process and also to the MRA Committee which is always welcoming to people prepared to contribute ideas, time and effort to maintaining our community.
Please update The Porcupine issue as there has been a new application for its demolition!
Maybe an extra meeting is needed, I am not available most evenings but, would make an extra effort to attend.
Best.
The MRA is continuing to oppose the development on traffic and pedestrian safety and security grounds, as well as unnecessary and inappropriate development.
Please contact the MRA secretary to join those receiving regular updates and invitations to participate.
I have just received a letter from planning this week, informing me of Lidls intentions on The Porcupine site again – So here comes Round 2. I am deeply dismayed the Councils Planning department have reconsidered. No matter how much Lidl reshape their plans, it will not alter the major challenge of increased traffic in an already over-saturated bottle neck.
Comments are closed.
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
That seems to be smoke to our eyes as we all just received a form to support or not the development. A monstrosity with views on expanding to neighbouring land. The amount of traffic, fumes and noise customers and deliveries will be unbearable. The “High” Street is suffering already though some have braved the climate and rented or refurbished a new shop. If they were happy to keep it as is, just like the Co-op did at Chislehurst, I might consider a more positive view but, not ever to demolish it and build a generic building thus destroying the little character left on the High Street. I wish the council would get its priorities together and purchase the building from that elusive agent. Then, the library ( which could see so much improvement ) and other services could run there along with a nice family centre, a restaurant which would generate income and halls to rent, even to the College, for functions, etc.
Good morning Athina
Much of the content of your comment was represented at the original battle over the site, and the destruction of the site was deferred by the ACV declaration. Interim discussions have fallen on totally deaf ears at Lidl, including offers to purchase. We are about to create a dedicated page on the website for new discussion, and would welcome your input. You are also encouraged to contribute your time and ideas to the process and also to the MRA Committee which is always welcoming to people prepared to contribute ideas, time and effort to maintaining our community.
Webmaster
Please update The Porcupine issue as there has been a new application for its demolition!
Maybe an extra meeting is needed, I am not available most evenings but, would make an extra effort to attend.
Best.
The MRA is continuing to oppose the development on traffic and pedestrian safety and security grounds, as well as unnecessary and inappropriate development.
Please contact the MRA secretary to join those receiving regular updates and invitations to participate.
Webmaster
I have just received a letter from planning this week, informing me of Lidls intentions on The Porcupine site again – So here comes Round 2. I am deeply dismayed the Councils Planning department have reconsidered. No matter how much Lidl reshape their plans, it will not alter the major challenge of increased traffic in an already over-saturated bottle neck.